NEWS, VIDEOS, INFORMATION AND TESTIMONIALS

Gov. Rick Scott and Cabinet move to mediation in Sunshine lawsuit

TALLAHASSEE — After weeks of behind-the-scenes legal combat, Gov. Rick Scott and Cabinet members will dispatch their lawyers to mediate differences with Florida news outlets in a lawsuit accusing all four officials of violating the Sunshine Law.The closed-door mediation session Wednesday in Tallahassee postpones a scheduled videotaped deposition of Gerald Bailey, the ousted commissioner of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. Bailey's secretly hatched dismissal triggered the lawsuit and has led to a series of reforms designed to improve Cabinet oversight of state agencies.

Michael Barfield, a paralegal for Sarasota attorney Andrea Flynn Mogensen, who represents more than a dozen news organizations, said plaintiffs agreed to mediation after repeated efforts by lawyers for Scott and the Cabinet to delay or limit the scope of Bailey's sworn testimony.

Under oath, Bailey is expected to repeat allegations of political interference by Scott's campaign and his staff that he made to the Times/Herald in January.

"They're obviously very sensitive about Bailey's deposition," Barfield said. "They don't want it to happen."

Scott's lead attorney, Peter Dunbar, did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

At the mediation table, Barfield said, news outlets will seek at a minimum:

• A requirement that high-level state officials post all text messages and emails on the state-run Project Sunburst website within 24 hours;

• Cancellation of the Jan. 13 vote by Scott and the Cabinet that made Rick Swearingen the FDLE commissioner, a common "cure" in Sunshine law cases. (Swearingen could be reappointed.);

• An executive order by Scott, permanently prohibiting state officials from using private email accounts to conduct public business;

• A new two-step process for future appointments of Cabinet agency heads with a public discussion of the pool of candidates followed by public interviews.

In informal talks among lawyers, Barfield said state officials have been receptive to the requests.

"We'll go to mediation and see if they're serious," Barfield said.

The Tampa Bay Times, Miami Herald and Associated Press are among the news organizations that have sued Scott and Cabinet members. Those outlets and others plan to send editors to attend the mediation session, which by law is confidential.

Barfield said he and Mogensen met for three hours with Bailey last week. He said news outlets are insisting that Bailey's deposition take place before a settlement can be reached.

"There will be no settlement absent some discovery," he said. "Even if we go to mediation, we're still taking Bailey's deposition."

The two sides have selected former Florida Supreme Court Justice Major Harding as mediator.

Harding is a shareholder in the Tallahassee firm of Ausley McMullen and specializes in alternative dispute resolution, according to his biography on the firm's website.

In a recent similar role as a hearing officer, Harding ruled in December that former Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston did not violate the university's code of student conduct.

 

By Steve Bousquet, tampabay.com
April, 2015

TESTIMONIALS

Connie Theron, Practising Attorney - UCT Law Clinic
“While working at the University of Stellenbosch Legal Aid Clinic and later at the UCT Law Clinic, I found the pro bono mediation services of Gerrie van der Watt of the Mediation Centre to be highly professional and extremely effective in our divorce matters. It is fantastic that our clients, with little or no financial means, can benefit from such an excellent programme.

The mediators are able to provide a non-threatening environment in which the clients are able to talk openly about issues that matter most to them, but which the Court in a divorce matter may choose not to entertain. Through the mediation sessions, the clients are able to reach an agreement together which ultimately they are both happy with. In cases where mediation did not yield the result of a settlement, the process was still extremely valuable, giving the parties better perspective and highlighting the key issues in dispute.”